On 24/apr/08, at 22:15, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
>>> D. Dante Lorenso wrote:
>>>> Or, here's another way to look at it ... make it easier to
>>>> modify ENUM datatypes because we all know that you will
>>>> eventually need that feature whether you males, females, and
>>>> unknowns think so or not.
>>> +1
>> Added to TODO:
>> * Allow adding enumerated values to an existing enumerated data
>> type
>
> And removing values if possible (fail if values are in use?).
And reorder them, too.
--
Giorgio Valoti