From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>,Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: HeapTupleSatisfiesToast() busted? (was atomic pin/unpin causing errors) |
Date: | 2016-05-11 15:26:50 |
Message-ID: | BB1A1CAE-4C97-4B32-B820-EAAD3EF19AFB@anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On May 11, 2016 7:06:05 AM PDT, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> wrote:
>>> Allow Pin/UnpinBuffer to operate in a lockfree manner.
>>> I get the errors:
>>>
>>> ERROR: attempted to delete invisible tuple
>>> ERROR: unexpected chunk number 1 (expected 2) for toast value
>
>Just reminder, you investigate "unexpected chunk number" problem, but,
>seems, we
>have another bug (first ERROR: attempted to delete invisible tuple).
>IMHO, it's
>a separate bug, not related to oid. Unfortunately, I've never seen such
>error on
>my notebook.
Same issue. If the dead tuple is noticed by heap_delete (when it should have deleted the live version elsewhere) you get the invisible role error. The unexpected chunk bit only triggers with hint bit sets differently across chunks.
Andres
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kohei KaiGai | 2016-05-11 15:41:46 | Re: Academic help for Postgres |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2016-05-11 15:01:38 | Re: Academic help for Postgres |