>
>Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>Package is similar to schema.
>
>Are you saying that the package would effectively *be* a schema from the
>outside. That is, if I have package "foo" then I can't also have a schema
>"foo"?
>
Yes, because I don't need duplicity in function's names.
Pavel
_________________________________________________________________
Najdete si svou lasku a nove pratele na Match.com. http://www.msn.cz/