| From: | "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, neilc(at)samurai(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: PLpgSQL: list of scalars as row for assign stmt, fore and fors stm |
| Date: | 2005-12-20 21:47:50 |
| Message-ID: | BAY20-F23389160B1A616EBE470F6F93E0@phx.gbl |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
>
>Tom Lane said:
> > "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)hotmail(dot)com> writes:
> >> x, y := r;
> >
> > That strikes me as a really bad idea. It weakens both syntax and
> > semantic error checking, to accomplish how much?
> >
>
>
>Where does the idea come from anyway? Has it been discussed on -hackers? I
>don't recall seeing it. Just sending in a patch for a "feature" you think
>is
>a good idea seems like a sub-optimal process.
>
No, this only my idea. I miss this functionality in fors and fore stmts. You
are true, so is better start discussion on this topic on hackers. But I
can't send attachments to -hackers. And I am not hacker or developer. I did
patch only. All others is on core hackers.
Regards
Pavel Stehule
_________________________________________________________________
Emotikony a pozadi programu MSN Messenger ozivi vasi konverzaci.
http://messenger.msn.cz/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-20 22:18:49 | Re: status of concurrent VACUUM patch ... |
| Previous Message | Hans-Jürgen Schönig | 2005-12-20 21:40:52 | status of concurrent VACUUM patch ... |