| From: | "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SQL/XML publishing function experimental patch |
| Date: | 2005-09-12 17:41:09 |
| Message-ID: | BAY20-F1899DEA2C1EFC4EE0D2ABCF99D0@phx.gbl |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
>1. Why did you base the datatype on cstring? That's inappropriate for
>anything except guaranteed-short strings, because it's not toastable.
>
It's only my laziness. I can adapt patch for TEXT. It's only temporary
solution. The goal is true xml type.
>2. Is it really necessary to hack up the grammar for this? Seems like
>you should create ordinary functions to manipulate the datatype(s).
>If every datatype thought it could do this sort of thing, we'd have
>a completely unmanageable grammar.
>
> regards, tom lane
I prefere any general solution. But there isn't. I hope SQL/XML syntax is
exception and the solution SQL/XML function is relative clean. There was
ideas about pretranslators from different syntaxs. Is this idea dead?
regards
Pavel Stehule
_________________________________________________________________
Emotikony a pozadi programu MSN Messenger ozivi vasi konverzaci.
http://messenger.msn.cz/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2005-09-12 17:53:28 | Re: docs: config chapter |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2005-09-12 16:56:30 | Re: Autovacuum docs |