primary key and existing unique fields

From: "Sally Sally" <dedeb17(at)hotmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: primary key and existing unique fields
Date: 2004-10-26 16:24:44
Message-ID: BAY101-F32W8BYXifWo0000151b@hotmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi all,
I am wandering about the pros and cons of creating a separate serial field
for a primary key when I already have a single unique field. This existing
unique field will have to be a character of fixed length (VARCHAR(12))
because although it's a numeric value there will be leading zeroes. There
are a couple more tables with similar unique fields and one of them would
need to reference the others. Does anybody see any good reason for adding a
separate autoincrement primary key field for each table? or either way is
not a big deal.
Sally

_________________________________________________________________
Dont just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Duane Lee - EGOVX 2004-10-26 16:46:15 Re: primary key and existing unique fields
Previous Message Thomas Hallgren 2004-10-26 16:21:23 Re: Bug or stupidity