From: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Stefan Keller <sfkeller(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: No implicit index created when adding primary key with ALTER TABLE |
Date: | 2011-06-14 07:49:20 |
Message-ID: | BANLkTinzK2WRu6Ys1FVvH2t5Y8cYuW3WaQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 14 June 2011 06:39, Stefan Keller <sfkeller(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I observed some strange behaviour when adding a primary key with ALTER TABLE:
>
> Given CREATE TABLE mytable1 (id serial, name text);
> I filled it with data then did a
> CREATE TABLE mytable2 AS SELECT * FROM mytable1;
> ALTER TABLE mytable2 ADD PRIMARY KEY(id);
>
> The last command reports - as usual - that implicitly an index on id
> ("mytable_pkey") was created - but it did not! It adds only a primary
> key constraint on id. Can anybody explain this?
>
> Yours, S.
>
> P.S. I have installed "PostgreSQL 9.1alpha1, compiled by Visual C++
> build 1500, 32-bit".
Shouldn't you be looking for mytable2_pkey?
--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Karsten Hilbert | 2011-06-14 07:52:04 | Re: determine client os |
Previous Message | Sim Zacks | 2011-06-14 07:39:11 | thoughts on interactive query |