Re: Formatting Curmudgeons WAS: MMAP Buffers

From: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Dan Ports <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu>, Kevin Grittner <kevin(dot)grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, andrew <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, greg <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Formatting Curmudgeons WAS: MMAP Buffers
Date: 2011-04-21 16:50:20
Message-ID: BANLkTinn6qVAT_P+jBk8isU6Qs2S1jf8Gw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> One could argue that its causing bad PR for postgres. I have seen several
> parties planning to migrate away or not migrate to postgres because of
> performance evaluations they made. With 7.4, 8.0 and 8.2. In 2010.

Well evaluating based on things past that can't be changed in the
absence of time machines doesn't offer us much guidance, as there
isn't anything that can be done in the present to fix such.
--
When confronted by a difficult problem, solve it by reducing it to the
question, "How would the Lone Ranger handle this?"

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2011-04-21 16:53:02 Re: fsync reliability
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2011-04-21 16:47:02 Re: fsync reliability