Re: PostgreSQL + FreeBSD memory configuration, and an issue

From: Vick Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org>
To: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL + FreeBSD memory configuration, and an issue
Date: 2011-04-08 14:05:35
Message-ID: BANLkTinkGs-MMXD24wb3SCLnF1uhF99Grg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Gipsz Jakab <clausewitz45(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Thanks Vick, I'll try it tonight. I will give 1024 shared_buffers and
> maintenance_work_mem, and 102 MB of work_mem.
>
> A question: I didn't use (it's marked with #) the effective_planner (or any
> other planner method or config option). Is it ok, when I turn it on with
> that parameter: 1036MB?
>
>
the variables below are all the ones I change from default other than the
logging settings (I like more verbose logging).

I have no opinion or experiences on any other settings.

>
> DROP/ADD TABLE stuck: I realized, that the locks number is so high, what
> about these settings:
>
>
I don't think it has to do with number of locks, but with actually waiting
for a lock.

> deadlock_timeout = 1s
> max_locks_per_transaction = 64
>
> is it ok? or is it too high?
>

That depends really on your application's needs. I wouldn't change it
unless you get warnings that you are hitting this limit.

Please keep the message on-list.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gipsz Jakab 2011-04-08 14:07:59 Re: PostgreSQL + FreeBSD memory configuration, and an issue
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2011-04-08 13:33:17 Re: PostgreSQL backend process high memory usage issue