| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [Fwd: Re: [ANNOUNCE] == PostgreSQL Weekly News - April 01 2011 ==] |
| Date: | 2011-04-04 00:40:41 |
| Message-ID: | BANLkTinkFGaPdxR6CqBbwo3+QB28erk4+Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Apr 2011 01:03:25 -0400, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>>> This was approved for -announce, why?
>>
>> Huh? The April Fools "PostgreSQL Weekly News" issues have routinely
>> been approved. See the archives.
>
> I don't have a problem with the original april fools email. My problem is
> that a reply to that email was approved.
Yes, exactly. The original email was fine - and quite funny - the
reply was not an announcement.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-04-04 00:41:27 | Re: Update book entry for PostgreSQL Reference Manual |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2011-04-03 20:38:10 | Who updates Freshmeat? |