| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade automatic testing |
| Date: | 2011-04-07 22:11:12 |
| Message-ID: | BANLkTinQMJRk6M1Ao-h=7+iUNh2RjNc1Rw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On tor, 2011-04-07 at 17:03 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I think it's a worthwhile thing to do, but right now I think it would
>> be more helpful if you could help fix the breakage your patch created,
>> rather than working on new stuff.
>
> This is part of that.
It's related. But we can release beta1 without improving the
regression testing framework for pg_upgrade. We cannot release beta1
with pg_upgrade broken.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-04-07 22:18:32 | Re: GSoC 2011 Eager MV implementation proposal |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-04-07 21:52:55 | Re: pg_upgrade bug found! |