On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> I want to achieve two things:
>
> 1. More understandable .pgpass format. Yes, I understand our standard
> format, most people won't. Like JoshB said, hard to debug.
How about allowing '#'-comments there and putting field
list into all templates, examples and manpages?
man 5 pgpass?
pgpass.sample?
IOW, do we need to change format or are we having documentation problem?
--
marko