From: | Ashesh Vashi <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: configure "stuff" |
Date: | 2011-06-27 07:34:46 |
Message-ID: | BANLkTin+VjVfEDmy4Mr5jAVSx0rcmGDUeg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Does this take of windows-build too? (Just question out of mind...)
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 20:35 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> > <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I received an email a few days ago (humm, weeks) about issues with
> > > compiling pgAdmin.
> > >
> > > ====== extract ======
> > > The file pgadmin/db/keywords.c has this statement in it:
> > > #include <server/parser/kwlist.h>
> > >
> > > Now it comes that pg_config does spit out either
> > > /usr/include/postgresql for the --includedir switch (for client things)
> > > and /usr/include/postgresql/9.0/server for --includedir-server. Given
> > > that both seems to work well for other stuff I'm unsure whether there
> is
> > > a problem here and it should rather be #include <parser/kwlist.h> (or
> > > the file be moved out of server context).
> > > ====== end of extract ======
> > >
> > > I took a quick look at it, and it seems we forgot something. If I'm not
> > > wrong, we don't use the --includedir-server switch for our includes in
> > > the configure script (actually, in the acinclude.m4 file). And it
> breaks
> > > the compilation on Debian when a user uses the PostgreSQL package on
> > > Debian or any other .deb linux distributions. We already do this for
> the
> > > package include dir (--pkgincludedir), I don't see any reason why we
> > > shouldn't do it for the server one.
> >
> > Hmm, that would explain it - until now it's worked for some people and
> > not for others and we've assumed it was a broken -dev package. I
> > assume something like this does the trick:
> >
> > diff --git a/acinclude.m4 b/acinclude.m4
> > index e379c62..f5eeaa4 100644
> > --- a/acinclude.m4
> > +++ b/acinclude.m4
> > @@ -548,8 +548,9 @@ AC_DEFUN([SETUP_POSTGRESQL],
> > AC_LANG_RESTORE
> >
> > PG_INCLUDE=`${PG_CONFIG} --includedir`
> > + PG_SVRINCLUDE=`${PG_CONFIG} --includedir-server`
> > PG_PKGINCLUDE=`${PG_CONFIG} --pkgincludedir`
> > - CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS -I${PG_INCLUDE} -I${PG_PKGINCLUDE}"
> > + CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS -I${PG_INCLUDE} -I${PG_SVRINCLUDE}
> > -I${PG_PKGINCLUDE}"
> >
> > PG_VERSION=`${PG_CONFIG} --version`
> >
>
> Yes, that's pretty much what I was thinking. There is also another file
> that needs to be updated:
>
> diff --git a/pgadmin/db/keywords.c b/pgadmin/db/keywords.c
> index 9370a9e..0362a71 100644
> --- a/pgadmin/db/keywords.c
> +++ b/pgadmin/db/keywords.c
> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
> */
> #define PG_KEYWORD(a,b,c) {a,c},
> const ScanKeyword ScanKeywords[] = {
> -#include <server/parser/kwlist.h>
> +#include "parser/kwlist.h"
> };
> const int NumScanKeywords = lengthof(ScanKeywords);
>
>
> Can I commit both changes?
>
>
> --
> Guillaume
> http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
> http://www.dalibo.com
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
>
--
--
Thanks & Regards,
Ashesh Vashi
EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company<http://www.enterprisedb.com>
*http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi*<http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2011-06-27 07:38:36 | pgAdmin III commit: Update .pot file. |
Previous Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2011-06-27 07:34:44 | Re: pgAdmin III commit: Database Designer (milestone 1 of GSoC 2011) |