Re: SSI non-serializable UPDATE performance

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dan Ports <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SSI non-serializable UPDATE performance
Date: 2011-04-25 13:52:53
Message-ID: BANLkTimz8baXb1YM6GZhPKpz1JMrUu91Ow@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Dan Ports <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 08:54:31AM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> Even though this didn't show any difference in Dan's performance
>> tests, it seems like reasonable insurance against creating a new
>> bottleneck in very high concurrency situations.
>>
>> Dan, do you have a patch for this, or should I create one?
>
> Sure, patch is attached.

Committed.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2011-04-25 14:00:21 Re: "stored procedures"
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2011-04-25 13:29:41 Re: branching for 9.2devel