Re: collateral benefits of a crash-safe visibility map

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: collateral benefits of a crash-safe visibility map
Date: 2011-05-10 17:49:50
Message-ID: BANLkTimtiiPSF4WPAGsmvHc-dS=z_fLwkQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Hmmm, do we really need to WAL log freezing?
>>
>> Can we break down freezing into a 2 stage process, so that we can have
>> first stage as a lossy operation and a second stage that is WAL
>> logged?
>
> That might solve the relfrozenxid problem - set the bits in the heap,
> sync the heap, then update relfrozenxid once the heap is guaranteed
> safely on disk - but it again seems problematic for Hot Standby.

How about we truncate the clog differently on each server? We could
have a special kind of VACUUM that runs during Hot Standby, setting
frozen hint bits only.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-05-10 17:51:59 Re: collateral benefits of a crash-safe visibility map
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-05-10 17:47:26 Re: 4.1beta1: ANYARRAY disallowed for DOMAIN types which happen to be arrays