Re: Proposal to shutdown pgFoundry

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Alexey Klyukin <alexk(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal to shutdown pgFoundry
Date: 2011-05-20 20:29:42
Message-ID: BANLkTimhA_Ts6AT_N57xjf8SHw7Rq6PgSw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

2011/5/20 Alexey Klyukin <alexk(at)commandprompt(dot)com>:
>
> On May 20, 2011, at 4:18 PM, Dave Page wrote:
>
>> 2011/5/20 Alexey Klyukin <alexk(at)commandprompt(dot)com>:
>>>
>>> On May 20, 2011, at 1:09 PM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 15:36 +0000, Dave Page wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I think we'd want to try to avoid doing that as it would require
>>>>> policing to ensure inappropriate content wasn't uploaded.
>>>>
>>>> (I quoted wrong email in my previous reply, sorry)
>>>>
>>>> We already allow *everyone* to distribute their tarballs through our FTP
>>>> mirror network...
>>>
>>> Why won't we direct them to PGXN? It seems to have a really nice way to store/discover PostgreSQL related projects.
>>
>> That might be appropriate for some packages, but certainly not all.
>
> I'm wondering what are these 'inappropriate' packages. Any examples?

The OLEDB driver. pgInstaller. StackBuilder all spring to mind.

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2011-05-20 20:33:08 Re: Proposal to shutdown pgFoundry
Previous Message Alexey Klyukin 2011-05-20 20:28:09 Re: Proposal to shutdown pgFoundry