Re: Fwd: Re: SSDD reliability

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: SSDD reliability
Date: 2011-05-05 03:06:37
Message-ID: BANLkTimZz2CnqYWOqoh0=HMH4eWvEioDjA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:31 PM, David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org> wrote:
>
> this). The technology and manufacturing processes are common across many
> different types of product. They either all work , or they all fail.

Most of it is. But certain parts are fairly new, i.e. the
controllers. It is quite possible that all these various failing
drives share some long term ~ 1 year degradation issue like the 6Gb/s
SAS ports on the early sandybridge Intel CPUs. If that's the case
then the just plain up and dying thing makes some sense.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Boreham 2011-05-05 03:34:07 Re: Fwd: Re: SSDD reliability
Previous Message David Boreham 2011-05-05 00:31:55 Re: Fwd: Re: SSDD reliability