Re: patch for 9.2: enhanced errors

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Steve Singer <ssinger_pg(at)sympatico(dot)ca>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: patch for 9.2: enhanced errors
Date: 2011-06-19 10:53:14
Message-ID: BANLkTimBzdqge6irhEjU+uTzn-MVjfxZ7w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2011/6/19 Steve Singer <ssinger_pg(at)sympatico(dot)ca>:
> On 11-06-18 06:36 PM, Steve Singer wrote:
>>
>> On 11-06-08 04:14 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>
>> Here is my review of this patch
>>
>> Submission Review:
>> ------------------------
>> The patch applies cleanly against master
>> The patch does not include any documentation updates (see note below to
>> update config.sgml)
>> The patch does not include any unit tests. At a minimum it should add a
>> few tests with verbosity set to verbose
>>
>
> On second thought tests might not work. Is the only way to get the
> constraint details are in verbose mode where line numbers from the c file
> are also included? If so then this won't work for the regression tests.
> Having the diff comparison fail every time someone makes an unrelated change
> to a source file isn't what we want.
>

it is reason why patch doesn't any regress test changes. I have to
look, if verbose mode is documented somewhere.

Regards

Pavel Stehule

>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2011-06-19 11:09:12 Re: plpgsql performance - SearchCatCache issue
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2011-06-19 10:51:13 Re: patch for 9.2: enhanced errors