From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: patch: Allow \dd to show constraint comments |
Date: | 2011-05-19 14:26:34 |
Message-ID: | BANLkTikn5NSSTvzTP3SFrC6DVycUHEP3JA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Attached is a simple patch addressing the TODO item "Allow \dd to show
> constraint comments". If you have comments on various constraints
> (column, foreign key, primary key, unique, exclusion), they should
> show up via \dd now.
>
> Some example SQL is attached to create two tables with a variety of
> constraints and constraint comments. With the patch, \dd should then
> produce something like this:
>
> Object descriptions
> Schema | Name | Object | Description
> --------+----------------------+------------+------------------------------
> public | bar_c_excl | constraint | exclusion constraint comment
> public | bar_pkey | constraint | two column pkey comment
> public | bar_uname_check | constraint | constraint for bar
> public | bar_uname_fkey | constraint | fkey comment
> public | uname_check_not_null | constraint | not null comment
> public | uname_cons | constraint | sanity check for uname
> public | uname_uniq_cons | constraint | unique constraint comment
> (7 rows)
>
> whereas without the patch, you should see nothing.
At the risk of opening a can of worms, if we're going to fix \dd,
shouldn't we fix it completely, and include comments on ALL the object
types that can have them? IIRC it's missing a bunch, not just
constraints.
Another thought is that I wonder if it's really useful to have a
backslash commands that dumps out comments on many different object
types. In some cases, e.g. \db+, we include the description for the
object in the output of the backslash command that lists objects just
of that type, which seems like a better design. Of course we have no
backslash command for constraints anyway....
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-05-19 14:32:32 | Re: Cannot build docs of 9.1 on Windows |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-05-19 14:19:24 | Re: DOMAINs and CASTs |