Re: smallserial / serial2

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Brar Piening <brar(at)gmx(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: smallserial / serial2
Date: 2011-06-22 02:58:21
Message-ID: BANLkTikeQFau=iVp38xhLgdmL-gbesoumQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Brar Piening <brar(at)gmx(dot)de> wrote:
>> I tried to look at everything and cover everthing but please consider that
>> this is my first review so please have a second look at it!
>
> I took a look at this as well, and I didn't encounter any problems
> either. The patch is surprisingly small, but it looks like all the
> documentation spots got covered, and I didn't see any missing pieces;
> pg_dump copes fine, I didn't try pg_upgrade but I wouldn't expect
> problems there either.
>
> Actually, the one piece I think could be added is a regression test. I
> didn't see any existing tests that covered bigserial/serial8, either,
> so I went ahead and added a few tests for smallerial and bigserial. I
> didn't see the testcases Brar posted at first, or I might have adopted
> a few from there, but this should cover basic use of smallserial.

Committed the main patch, and your regression tests.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-06-22 03:04:51 Re: [v9.2] DROP Reworks Part.0 - 'missing_ok' support of get_object_address
Previous Message Brendan Jurd 2011-06-22 02:38:36 Re: Fwd: Keywords in pg_hba.conf should be field-specific