Re: Input and Output data traffic

From: Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Israel Ben Guilherme Fonseca <israel(dot)bgf(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: psycopg(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Input and Output data traffic
Date: 2011-05-11 13:14:04
Message-ID: BANLkTikctiPtvj4UzWLj=QEqbwaJ21Jjew@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: psycopg

On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Israel Ben Guilherme Fonseca
<israel(dot)bgf(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> About caching plan / binary protocol (and I know very-little-almost-nothing
> about these), it can't be used with psycopg? Let's say that the jdbc driver
> use these techniques, shouldn't psycopg do the same? (let-me repeat that I
> may not know about what i'm talking here. :) )

We still don't know if the difference comes from anything of the
above. And even if id did, everything has a tradeoff: we should see if
the change would be a net improvement, as the bandwidth required is
only one of the possible parameters to take in consideration.

-- Daniele

In response to

Browse psycopg by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oswaldo 2011-05-11 14:21:15 Re: Input and Output data traffic
Previous Message Israel Ben Guilherme Fonseca 2011-05-11 13:04:14 Re: Input and Output data traffic