From: | Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Israel Ben Guilherme Fonseca <israel(dot)bgf(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | psycopg(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Input and Output data traffic |
Date: | 2011-05-11 13:14:04 |
Message-ID: | BANLkTikctiPtvj4UzWLj=QEqbwaJ21Jjew@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | psycopg |
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Israel Ben Guilherme Fonseca
<israel(dot)bgf(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> About caching plan / binary protocol (and I know very-little-almost-nothing
> about these), it can't be used with psycopg? Let's say that the jdbc driver
> use these techniques, shouldn't psycopg do the same? (let-me repeat that I
> may not know about what i'm talking here. :) )
We still don't know if the difference comes from anything of the
above. And even if id did, everything has a tradeoff: we should see if
the change would be a net improvement, as the bandwidth required is
only one of the possible parameters to take in consideration.
-- Daniele
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oswaldo | 2011-05-11 14:21:15 | Re: Input and Output data traffic |
Previous Message | Israel Ben Guilherme Fonseca | 2011-05-11 13:04:14 | Re: Input and Output data traffic |