Re: Process wakeups when idle and power consumption

From: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Process wakeups when idle and power consumption
Date: 2011-05-10 17:55:24
Message-ID: BANLkTikUnikfBvWLA8gKULmJ307H71st=w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10 May 2011 17:43, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:

> It should be an anonymous pipe that's inherited by the child process by
> rather than a named pipe. Otherwise seems fine to me, as far as this proof
> of concept program goes.

Alright, thanks. I'll use an anonymous pipe in the patch itself.

--
Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-05-10 17:59:16 Re: Collation mega-cleanups
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2011-05-10 17:55:21 Re: collateral benefits of a crash-safe visibility map