On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Dan Ports <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
> I see Robert committed that one already. If there's a consensus that
> omitting the pid for committed transactions is the right thing to do,
> I'm happy to put together a patch. I think that is a better approach
> than trying to keep it after commit until the connection closes, but
> all of this is sufficiently minor that it's probably not worth worrying
> much about.
I couldn't really figure out why that would be better, but if there's
a reason I'm fine with it.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-04-04 18:48:49|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Uppercase SGML entity declarations|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2011-04-04 18:42:07|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Uppercase SGML entity declarations |