Re: time table for beta1

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dan Ports <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: time table for beta1
Date: 2011-04-04 18:43:25
Message-ID: BANLkTikQCSWfvM8_CF3YN1uLpRyxcdfUow@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Dan Ports <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
> I see Robert committed that one already. If there's a consensus that
> omitting the pid for committed transactions is the right thing to do,
> I'm happy to put together a patch. I think that is a better approach
> than trying to keep it after commit until the connection closes, but
> all of this is sufficiently minor that it's probably not worth worrying
> much about.

I couldn't really figure out why that would be better, but if there's
a reason I'm fine with it.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-04-04 18:48:49 Re: [HACKERS] Uppercase SGML entity declarations
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-04-04 18:42:07 Re: [HACKERS] Uppercase SGML entity declarations