Re: Vacuumdb error

From: Carl von Clausewitz <clausewitz45(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Vacuumdb error
Date: 2011-04-14 16:52:17
Message-ID: BANLkTikJMeO_=TPM-1bzgBV-QjNJ=kJ7+A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Ok thanks, the information. I've made the mistake, I will change the script,
but I will try, that Vidhya told me. Let me see, what will going on.

Regards,
Carl

2011/4/14 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>

> Carl von Clausewitz <clausewitz45(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Maintenance:
> > #!/bin/sh
> > date >> /var/log/postgresql_maintenance.log
> > /usr/local/bin/reindexdb --all --username=cvc >>
> > /var/log/postgresql_maintenance.log
> > echo "Reindex done" >> /var/log/postgresql_maintenance.log
> > /usr/local/bin/vacuumdb --all --full --analyze --username=cvc >>
> > /var/log/postgresql_maintenance.log
> > echo "Vacuum done" >> /var/log/postgresql_maintenance.log
>
> Just FYI, the reindex step is 100% useless if you're going to do a
> vacuum full afterwards.
>
> Before 9.0 there was some value in doing vacuum full and then reindex,
> but none whatsoever in the other ordering. As of 9.0 there's just no
> point at all in doing both. VACUUM FULL rebuilds the indexes anyway.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Benjamin Smith 2011-04-14 16:56:12 Re: SSDs with Postgresql?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-04-14 16:46:15 Re: Vacuumdb error