Re: Difference in postgres9.0.4 and postgres9.1beta1 when displaying error lines in functions with comments

From: Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda <acamari(at)verlet(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Difference in postgres9.0.4 and postgres9.1beta1 when displaying error lines in functions with comments
Date: 2011-06-10 02:23:38
Message-ID: BANLkTik4d_4HQtLZmuD7CsRj_N5B+1uHDw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

Thanks... and sorry for sending it to hackers list... I had not read the bug
reporting guides... nor the release notes... it seems.

Again, thanks.

On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda <acamari(at)verlet(dot)org> writes:
>> Postgres 9.0.4 and postgres9.1beta1 give different line of error numbers on
>> functions that raise runtime errors (it seems).
>
> This is not a bug.  See the release notes:
>
>        Adjust PL/pgSQL's error line numbering code to be consistent
>        with other PLs (Pavel Stehule)
>
>        Previously, PL/pgSQL would ignore (not count) an empty line at
>        the start of the function body. Since this was inconsistent with
>        all other languages, the special case was removed.
>
>                        regards, tom lane
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-06-10 03:24:36 Re: collation problem on 9.1-beta1
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-06-10 02:22:13 Re: Difference in postgres9.0.4 and postgres9.1beta1 when displaying error lines in functions with comments

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Kupershmidt 2011-06-10 02:27:41 Re: smallserial / serial2
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-06-10 02:22:13 Re: Difference in postgres9.0.4 and postgres9.1beta1 when displaying error lines in functions with comments