Re: Discussion - Search Objects

On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 2:01 AM, Jasmin Dizdarevic <
jasmin(dot)dizdarevic(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>
>
> 2011/6/16 Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
>
>> On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 23:48 +0200, Jasmin Dizdarevic wrote:
>> > Yeah, I know. All of the dialogs have a "binding" to some pgObject,
>> > because all of them modifies something.
>>
>> No, see dlgFindAndReplace.
>>
>> > When I started working I had no clear picture about the class
>> > hierarchy and I thought this would be an easier entry point. I can
>> > change the prefix if this is wished.
>> >
>>
>> Yeah, I think it would be better.
>>
>>
> I'm going to change that.
>
>
>>
>> > btw: You could help me with the factory class. Am I starting the
>> > dialog correctly?
>> >
>>
>> Seems good to me. My only question is: why in frmMain.ccp and not in
>>> frmSearchObject.cpp? I first tried the latter, and was surprised to find
>>> it in the former.
>>
>>
>> I'm currently surprised myself ;)
>
>
>
>> BTW, can you stop top-posting please? Thanks.
>>> Regards.
>>
>>
>> I'll try it.
>
> One more thing:
>
> Can somebody say me how to merge different patches to a single one? I've
> made 3-4 commits and would like to have exactly one patch file. It's not so
> important, but it would be very nice.
>
Hope - this will help:
git log -p -n <number_patches> --author=jasmin > <patch_file>

>
> Generally, I wanna thank you for your patience and help - I know this can
> be frustrating to answer questions, that are clear to you since a long time
> :)
>
>
>
>> --
>> Guillaume
>> http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
>> http://www.dalibo.com
>>
>>
>

--
--

Thanks & Regards,

Ashesh Vashi
EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company<http://www.enterprisedb.com>

*http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi*<http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi>