| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dan Ports <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SSI work for 9.1 |
| Date: | 2011-06-17 04:32:46 |
| Message-ID: | BANLkTi=_RZPYk2VLOY17Mnu-qTurHP=dVA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:30 AM, Dan Ports <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:49:48PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Does this mean that the open item "more SSI loose ends" can now be
>> marked resolved?
>
> I was just looking at it and contemplating moving it to the non-blockers
> list. Of the five items:
> - (1) and (4) are resolved
> - (2) isn't an issue -- maybe we want to add a comment, someplace but
> I'm not convinced even that is necessary
> - (3) is a regression test, and is already on the list separately
> - (5) is a doc issue only
>
> There are no open issues with the code that I'm aware of.
Perhaps it would be best to remove the general item and replace it
with a list of more specific things that need doing - which might just
mean #5.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Smith | 2011-06-17 04:39:39 | Re: procpid? |
| Previous Message | Dan Ports | 2011-06-17 04:30:16 | Re: SSI work for 9.1 |