| From: | Rob Wultsch <wultsch(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jehan-Guillaume (ioguix) de Rorthais" <ioguix(at)free(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | damien clochard <damien(at)dalibo(dot)info>, Roy Hann <specially(at)processed(dot)almost(dot)meat>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory |
| Date: | 2011-05-05 15:36:33 |
| Message-ID: | BANLkTi=QpR3fVHmEhEBaXOYzyupvOwBECg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 5:36 AM, Jehan-Guillaume (ioguix) de Rorthais
<ioguix(at)free(dot)fr> wrote:
> Yeah, but volatile means « lost on shutdown », which is not the case here
> during a clean shutdown.
Isn't that how the table should be treated though?
--
Rob Wultsch
wultsch(at)gmail(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jehan-Guillaume (ioguix) de Rorthais | 2011-05-05 15:47:11 | Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory |
| Previous Message | Jehan-Guillaume (ioguix) de Rorthais | 2011-05-05 12:36:07 | Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jehan-Guillaume (ioguix) de Rorthais | 2011-05-05 15:47:11 | Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2011-05-05 14:25:29 | Re: VARIANT / ANYTYPE datatype |