| From: | Samuel Gendler <sgendler(at)ideasculptor(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: picking a filesystem |
| Date: | 2011-05-31 17:58:45 |
| Message-ID: | BANLkTi=GB2nJT+CxjdRO5T3GP_y2_gL6Dw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> So if you're running a RHEL5.4 or RHEL5.5 system, are you basically
> stuck with ext3? I'm not sure if I'm remembering correctly, but ISTM
> that you've been uncomfortable with BOTH ext4 and XFS prior to RHEL6;
> but OK with both beginning with RHEL6.
>
> Also, any tips on mount options for XFS/ext4/ext3?
>
Greg's book has a whole chapter that goes through the pros and cons of each
type of fs and offers suggestions for configuring most of them for postgres.
I haven't actually read the chapter in detail yet, so I won't try to
summarize its content here. It appeared to be pretty comprehensive during my
quick scan of the chapter
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-05-31 21:58:08 | Re: Hash Anti Join performance degradation |
| Previous Message | Shaun Thomas | 2011-05-31 17:09:23 | Re: picking a filesystem |