| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: the big picture for index-only scans |
| Date: | 2011-05-14 00:59:58 |
| Message-ID: | BANLkTi=Ayq-j7WZTabtRtTXSxgGcpReRkA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Cédric Villemain
<cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Will you be able to do some ? or can you propose a simple process to
> do efficient benchmark of the patch ?
I will probably do some benchmarking at some point, unless someone
else goes nuts and makes it moot before I get to that point. I think
the main thing is to just apply the patch and beat up the server, and
see if it's any slower than it was before.
> If reviewers agree it is safe and benchmarks make evidences that no
> basic performance issue are raised, then let's see if next items have
> blockers or can be done.
Sounds right to me.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-05-14 01:52:47 | Re: Visual Studio 2010/Windows SDK 7.1 support |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-05-14 00:55:34 | Re: Reducing overhead of frequent table locks |