Re: procpid?

From: Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: procpid?
Date: 2011-06-11 08:02:25
Message-ID: BANLkTi=6gVU5Q0OcDgQzrstb9k38cuf9SA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> wrote:
>
> It's damn annoying... enough so that I'd personally be in favor of creating a pid column that has the same data so we can deprecate
> procpid and eventually remove it...

well, if we will start changing bad picked names we will have a *lot*
of work to do... starting by the project's name ;)

--
Jaime Casanova         www.2ndQuadrant.com
Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Rasheed 2011-06-11 13:32:15 Re: creating CHECK constraints as NOT VALID
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-06-11 05:09:45 Re: Core Extensions relocation