Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend
Date: 2020-09-17 09:41:28
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 17 Sep 2020, at 09:41, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 10:23:34AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Adding a <productname> markup around OpenSSL in the docs makes things
>> consistent. +1.
> I have looked at 0001, and applied it after fixing the line length
> (thanks for not doing it to ease my lookup), and I found one extra
> place in need of fix.


> Patch 0002 is failing to apply.

Attached is a v10 rebased to apply on top of HEAD.

cheers ./daniel

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Support-for-NSS-as-a-TLS-backend-v10.patch application/octet-stream 397.0 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2020-09-17 09:48:17 PostmasterIsAlive() in recovery (non-USE_POST_MASTER_DEATH_SIGNAL builds)
Previous Message Amit Khandekar 2020-09-17 09:05:44 Re: calling procedures is slow and consumes extra much memory against calling function