Re: Solaris 2.6 support.

From: Keary Suska <hierophant(at)pcisys(dot)net>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Solaris 2.6 support.
Date: 2001-10-24 23:46:07
Message-ID: B7FCAEDF.547E%hierophant@pcisys.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Usually compilation errors, sometimes unexpected core dumps or unresolved
symbol issues. I don't recall many specifics, but I have had the least
number of problems using gcc as opposed to ecgs or stock Solaris cc. Just my
personal experience.

Keary Suska
Esoteritech, Inc.
"Leveraging Open Source for a better Internet"

> From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 23:57:36 +0200 (CEST)
> To: Keary Suska <hierophant(at)pcisys(dot)net>
> Cc: PostgreSQL <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Solaris 2.6 support.
>
> Keary Suska writes:
>
>> Probably. I have successfully compiled and installed 7.0.3 on Sparc/2.6,
>> without any problems if I recall. I can't imagine that 7.1.3 makes that much
>> difference. I would be sure to use gcc, however, to avoid any compilation
>> oddities.
>
> What kind of oddities?
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2001-10-24 23:47:28 Re: Writing BLOBS to pgsql via ODBC using VB
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2001-10-24 23:30:02 Re: Disable Transaction - plans ?