Re: JSON for PG 9.2

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Joey Adams <joeyadams3(dot)14159(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Claes Jakobsson <claes(at)gluefinance(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Subject: Re: JSON for PG 9.2
Date: 2011-12-21 02:05:30
Message-ID: B784010D-3F8B-4E84-B984-2B2FE805623F@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Dec 20, 2011, at 2:13 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:

> Yes, that's why I said "few" not "none".
>
> Though in my experience, most companies are a lot more restrictive
> about addons to their database than addons to their development
> environments.

Yeah, we’re getting off-topic here, so I’ll just say something we can agree on: We’ll see.

I do still want to see some processes for getting PGXN distributions into RPM/.deb/StackBuilder, though.

Best,

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2011-12-21 02:06:53 Re: JSON for PG 9.2
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2011-12-21 02:04:29 Re: JSON for PG 9.2