Re: pgAdmin3 port to MacOsX

From: Adam H(dot)Pendleton <fmonkey(at)fmonkey(dot)net>
To: "Stefan Csomor" <csomor(at)advancedconcepts(dot)ch>
Cc: <jm(at)poure(dot)com>, <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgAdmin3 port to MacOsX
Date: 2003-09-14 21:23:42
Message-ID: B7676A38-E6F9-11D7-B514-000A9566CE14@fmonkey.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

On Sunday, Sep 14, 2003, at 12:41 US/Eastern, Stefan Csomor wrote:

> Hi
>
> basically we have two options :
>
> I have implemented unicode for wxMac a few weeks ago with one
> restriction :
>
> for 10.2 we need the Metrowerks Compiler environement, since their
> C-runtime
> supports wchar, whereas Apple's Dev Tools don't , rewriting wxMac to
> use
> apple's own unicode support at the moment for me is out of the
> question due
> to time constraints
>
> for 10.3 we can work with the apple developer tools
>
> So I guess it would be the easiest way to go for 10.3 only...
>

Hmmm. Well, I don't have the Metrowerks compiler, but I could probably
get my hands on it if I needed to. I am not using Mac OS X 10.3, but I
probably could if I needed to (though I don't know how this would help
us).

What is needed to get wxMac to support Apple's Unicode on 10.2? Is
there anything I can do to help? I've got the time, but I don't know
the particulars about what would need to be done.

I don't think that supporting 10.3 only is a good idea, only because
10.3 is still in beta, and would be just a useful as producing no Mac
port at all. OTOH, I can take a look at getting a Metrowerks compiler
to produce binary snapshots.

Dave, what do you think?

ahp

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Pflug 2003-09-14 22:33:52 Re: pgAdmin3 port to MacOsX
Previous Message Stefan Csomor 2003-09-14 16:41:54 Re: pgAdmin3 port to MacOsX