From: | Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Roger Hand" <RHand(at)kailea(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Dean Gibson (DB Administrator)" <postgresql4(at)ultimeth(dot)com>, "pgsql-general" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PSQL suggested enhancement |
Date: | 2005-10-20 06:52:45 |
Message-ID: | B764CD6E-7E2D-42D3-8789-954560EC7A1F@myrealbox.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Oct 20, 2005, at 15:45 , Roger Hand wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
>> [mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Michael
>> Glaesemann
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 11:24 PM
>>
>
>
>> On Oct 20, 2005, at 14:50 , Dean Gibson (DB Administrator) wrote:
>>
>>> PSQL has the option to output the result of queries in several
>>> different formats, including HTML. Suggestion: have an option to
>>> output query results in XML format.
>>>
>>
>> My personal opinion on this is that there are a lot of different
>> ideas about how the XML should/could be written, and a the current
>> output can be piped to a script in <insert favorite scripting
>> language here> to format to match anyone's wish. Rather than have
>> psql decree the one and true format or include so many as to make
>> maintainability burdensome, further formatting is best left to the
>> end user.
>>
>
> By that reasoning there shouldn't be html format either.
Agreed :) I'd submit a patch to remove it if I thought it'd be
accepted--and more importantly, if I thought it were worth the time
it'd take me (I'm still learning C, and the little bit of PostgreSQL
code I'm familiar with is not the psql client) (excuses excuses :).
Though justification for removing a feature is different from that of
adding or extending one: removing one breaks backwards compatibility.
Michael Glaesemann
grzm myrealbox com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Glaesemann | 2005-10-20 06:57:41 | Re: NULL != text ? |
Previous Message | Roger Hand | 2005-10-20 06:45:10 | Re: PSQL suggested enhancement |