Re: ModifyTable overheads in generic plans

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com
Subject: Re: ModifyTable overheads in generic plans
Date: 2020-07-01 09:50:19
Message-ID: B5CD136E-F391-4F4C-B01B-EE6C4B71C2DB@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 1 Jul 2020, at 08:30, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 9:36 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I would like to discuss a refactoring patch that builds on top of the
>> patches at [1] to address $subject.
>
> I forgot to update a place in postgres_fdw causing one of its tests to crash.
>
> Fixed in the attached updated version.

The attached 0003 fails to apply to current HEAD, please submit another rebased
version. Marking the entry as Waiting on Author in the meantime.

cheers ./daniel

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2020-07-01 09:56:36 Re: partition routing layering in nodeModifyTable.c
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2020-07-01 09:45:06 Re: Towards easier AMs: Cleaning up inappropriate use of name "relkind"