| From: | Neale(dot)Ferguson(at)SoftwareAG-USA(dot)com |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | RE: Linux for S/390 Patches |
| Date: | 2000-11-17 14:31:10 |
| Message-ID: | B48FCF558294D311ADD90080C8FAF3F8013324E8@sunshine.softwareag-usa.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-ports |
config.guess comes back with s390-ibm-linux so s390 would be the choice for
processor.
I'll attempt to track the differences down and get back to you.
-----Original Message-----
We list platforms by "OS" and "Processor". What would be the correct
entries for S/390? Presumably S/390 is the processor, but I'm not
familiar with how IBM does their labeling...
:
:
I'll guess that the inet failures are due to differences in bit-shifting
behavior when generating masks. Will you have time to look at it? You
are probably already familiar with the tree, but if not look in
src/backend/utils/adt/ for the inet support.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2000-11-17 14:44:38 | Re: Linux for S/390 Patches |
| Previous Message | Kevin Lo | 2000-11-17 09:44:51 | Re: PostgreSql's making error in Windows NT4.0 Server |