|From:||Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>|
|To:||Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>|
|Cc:||Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(dot)casanova(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>|
|Subject:||Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox|
> On 28 Jul 2017, at 16:46, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 12:39 AM, Pavan Deolasee
> <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I see your point. But I would like to think this way: does the technology
>> significantly help many common use cases, that are currently not addressed
>> by HOT? It probably won't help all workloads, that's given. Also, we don't
>> have any credible alternative while this patch has progressed quite a lot.
>> May be Robert will soon present the pluggable storage/UNDO patch and that
>> will cover everything and more that is currently covered by HOT/WARM. That
>> will probably make many other things redundant.
> A lot of work is currently being done on this, by multiple people,
> mostly not including me, and a lot of good progress is being made.
> But it's not exactly ready to ship, nor will it be any time soon. I
> think we can run a 1-client pgbench without crashing the server at
> this point, if you tweak the configuration a little bit and don't do
> anything fancy like, say, try to roll back a transaction. :-)
The discussions in this implies that there is a bit more work on this patch,
which also hasn’t moved in the current commitfest, so marking it Returned with
Feedback. Please re-submit this work in a future commitfest when ready for a
new round of reviews.
|Next Message||Emre Hasegeli||2017-10-02 09:46:15||Re: [PATCH] Improve geometric types|
|Previous Message||Daniel Gustafsson||2017-10-02 09:31:07||Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq|