Re: Online verification of checksums

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Asif Rehman <asifr(dot)rehman(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Online verification of checksums
Date: 2021-09-02 11:18:47
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 9 Jul 2021, at 22:00, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> I am changing the status to "Waiting on Author" based on the latest comments of @David Steele
> and secondly the patch does not apply cleanly.

This patch hasn’t moved since marked as WoA in the last CF and still doesn’t
apply, unless there is a new version brewing it seems apt to close this as RwF
and await a new entry in a future CF.

Daniel Gustafsson

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2021-09-02 11:19:34 Re: pg_receivewal: remove extra conn = NULL; in StreamLog
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-09-02 11:12:41 Re: stat() vs ERROR_DELETE_PENDING, round N + 1