Re: [PATCH] kNN for btree

From: "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
To: "Anton A(dot) Melnikov" <a(dot)melnikov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kNN for btree
Date: 2024-03-31 09:22:43
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 15 Jan 2024, at 13:11, Anton A. Melnikov <a(dot)melnikov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> If there are any ideas pro and contra would be glad to discuss them.

Hi, Anton!

This is kind of ancient thread. I've marked CF entry [0] as "Needs review" and you as an author (seems like you are going to be a point of correspondence on this feature).

At this point it's obvious that the feature won't make it to 17, so let's move to July CF. Given 7 years of history in this thread, you might want to start a new one with a summarisation of this thread. This will attract more reviewers, either way they have to dig on their own.


Best regards, Andrey Borodin.


In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Banck 2024-03-31 10:18:29 Re: Security lessons from liblzma
Previous Message Andrey M. Borodin 2024-03-31 09:12:01 Re: logicalrep_worker_launch -- counting/checking the worker limits