Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: List of prominent users

From: "Andy Astor" <andya(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>,"Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: List of prominent users
Date: 2005-12-04 21:33:04
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
My 2 cents... It is common practice to list customers on web sites. It's
also common for companies to ask to be removed. I suggest we just put up
the list, and take people off if they ask. 

Of course, if a company or agency had previously told us their
involvement was confidential, we would respect that.

We should just go with the list. There's unlikely to be any problem that
can't be rectified easily.

	-- Andy

Andy Astor
EnterpriseDB Corporation

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-advocacy-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org [mailto:pgsql-advocacy-
> owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Joshua D. Drake
> Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 12:30 PM
> To: Greg Sabino Mullane
> Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] List of prominent users
> >
> > No, they can't. We can't create a product called "Orakle", but we
> > certainly talk about the company Oracle(tm) all we want. I don't see
> > the big deal with posting such a list: if a company does not want to
> > be on it, they can send us an email and we'd more than likely
> >
> Trade Secret.
> I am not saying they would. I am saying the could.
> ---------------------------(end of
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?


pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Gevik babakhaniDate: 2005-12-04 21:39:34
Subject: Re: List of prominent users
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2005-12-04 17:30:18
Subject: Re: List of prominent users

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group