Re: [PATCH] Atomic pgrename on Windows

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org,Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>,Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>,Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>,Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>,pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Atomic pgrename on Windows
Date: 2020-03-30 20:37:00
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On March 30, 2020 9:17:00 AM PDT, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>So far as pg_stat_tmp is concerned, I think there is reasonable hope
>that that problem is just going to go away in the near future.
>I've not been paying attention to the shared-memory stats collector
>thread so I'm not sure if that's anywhere near committable, but
>I think that's clearly something we'll want once it's ready.

I'd give it a ~30-40% chance for 13 at this point. The patch improved a lot after the review cycles in the last ~10 days, but still needs a good bit more polish.


Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2020-03-30 20:43:59 Re: backup manifests
Previous Message Robert Haas 2020-03-30 20:16:10 Re: backup manifests