| From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, andres(at)sayago(dot)info, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: UPDATE with database name alias |
| Date: | 2005-09-20 03:01:02 |
| Message-ID: | B138A915-5D8C-4BF3-85C5-00D16DFDD605@fastcrypt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
It's an option, but it's an Oracle product, chances are they would
ignore it.
Dave
On 19-Sep-05, at 10:53 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> writes:
>
>> On Mon, 19 Sep 2005 andres(at)sayago(dot)info wrote:
>>
>>> JDeveloper use alias to UPDATE, an dthen, what can I do?
>>>
>
>
>> Your only option would be to ajdust the postgresql backend grammar to
>> allow an alias.
>>
>
> Isn't it an option to point out to the JDeveloper authors that they
> are
> emitting SQL that is illegal per spec?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John R Pierce | 2005-09-20 04:29:19 | Re: UPDATE with database name alias |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-09-20 02:53:13 | Re: UPDATE with database name alias |