Windows XP 64 bit

From: "Campbell, Lance" <lance(at)uiuc(dot)edu>
To: <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Windows XP 64 bit
Date: 2008-03-19 19:00:47
Message-ID: B10E6810AC2A2F4EA7550D072CDE8760CDDC40@SAB-FENWICK.sab.uiuc.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

I posted this question to the admin group. I just realized that I
should have sent it here.

I just read the following article:

http://people.planetpostgresql.org/mha/index.php?/archives/162-PostgreSQ
L-vs-64-bit-windows.html

Would there be benefits in running PostgreSQL in a 32 bit mode on a 64
bit version of XP? My thought is that the OS could access more of the
memory for the caching of the files. On my production Linux box, I
don't allocate more than a 2 Gig to PostgreSQL. I leave the rest of the
memory available for the caching of disk files. So even though
PostgreSQL would be running in a 32 bit mode it seems like it would
still run better on a 64 bit XP box compared to a 32 bit version. This
of course assumes that one does have a sizeable database and more than 3
Gig of memory.

Is this a correct assumption?

Would the performance be relatively similar to that of Linux?

Thanks,

Lance Campbell

Project Manager/Software Architect

Web Services at Public Affairs

University of Illinois

217.333.0382

http://webservices.uiuc.edu

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Koczan 2008-03-19 21:21:21 Re: Anyone using a SAN?
Previous Message Albe Laurenz 2008-03-19 15:19:34 Re: PG writes a lot to the disk