From: | "Campbell, Lance" <lance(at)uiuc(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | "Campbell, Lance" <lance(at)uiuc(dot)edu>, "posgres support" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Windows 64 bit |
Date: | 2008-03-19 18:46:51 |
Message-ID: | B10E6810AC2A2F4EA7550D072CDE8760CDDC3F@SAB-FENWICK.sab.uiuc.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
I just read the following article:
http://people.planetpostgresql.org/mha/index.php?/archives/162-PostgreSQ
L-vs-64-bit-windows.html
Would there be benefits in running PostgreSQL in a 32 bit mode on a 64
bit version of XP? My thought is that the OS could access more of the
memory for the caching of the files. I come to this understanding
because on my production Linux box, I don't allocate more than a 2 Gig
to PostgreSQL. I leave the rest of the memory available for the caching
of disk files. So even though PostgreSQL would be running in a 32 bit
mode it seems like it would still run better on a 64 bit XP box compared
to a 32 bit version. This of course assumes that one does have a
sizeable database.
Is this a correct assumption?
Thanks,
Lance Campbell
Project Manager/Software Architect
Web Services at Public Affairs
University of Illinois
217.333.0382
________________________________
From: pgsql-admin-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-admin-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Campbell, Lance
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 11:58 AM
To: posgres support
Subject: [ADMIN] Windows 64 bit
I noticed that there is not a 64 bit windows version of postgres
binaries. When will the 64 bit version be available?
Thanks,
Lance Campbell
Project Manager/Software Architect
Web Services at Public Affairs
University of Illinois
217.333.0382
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bhella Paramjeet-PFCW67 | 2008-03-19 18:50:11 | Postgres database and firewall |
Previous Message | Aaron Brown | 2008-03-19 17:53:37 | pg_restore failing with "ERROR: out of memory" |