Re: Weird test mixup

From: "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Weird test mixup
Date: 2024-04-08 09:29:43
Message-ID: B09D9D09-E8B6-411A-9DFD-45977DB5B75C@yandex-team.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 8 Apr 2024, at 11:55, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> the point of the test is to make sure that the local
> cleanup happens
Uh, I did not understand this. Because commit message was about stabiilzizing tests, not extending coverage.
Also, should we drop function wait_pid() at the end of a test?
Given that tweaks with are nothing new, I think patch looks good.

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2024-04-08 09:34:09 Re: Table AM Interface Enhancements
Previous Message Nazir Bilal Yavuz 2024-04-08 09:23:56 Re: Speed up clean meson builds by ~25%