Re: References/Links missing

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: oli(dot)sennhauser(at)fromdual(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: References/Links missing
Date: 2026-08-01 18:47:26
Message-ID: B07FFFF9-641E-4C4F-8B87-0A755E141804@yesql.se
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

> On 31 Jul 2026, at 11:08, PG Doc comments form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:

> Is it worth to take the effort to add more/all references?
>
> What are the rules? Only the first occurrence or all occurrences of a
> keyword?

Our style guide doesn't offer guidance on this topic, personally I can see
value in adding more links to make cross-referencing during reading easier.
Would you like to prepare a patch with your suggestions that we can discuss?

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2026-08-01 19:44:18 Re: Fix data checksum progress reporting docs
Previous Message David Rowley 2026-08-01 03:04:04 Re: [PATCH] doc: outline all planner nodes