Re: should INSERT SELECT use a BulkInsertState?

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, Luc Vlaming <luc(at)swarm64(dot)com>, houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Subject: Re: should INSERT SELECT use a BulkInsertState?
Date: 2021-11-04 12:24:21
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 27 Sep 2021, at 02:08, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> wrote:

> I split off the simple part again. If there's no interest in the 0001 patch
> alone, then I guess it should be closed in the CF.

Since the thread has stalled, maybe that's the best course of action here. Any
objections from anyone on the thread?

Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2021-11-04 12:34:33 Re: standby recovery fails (tablespace related) (tentative patch and discussion)
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2021-11-04 12:12:13 Re: LogwrtResult contended spinlock